Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!simmel From: simmel@ginosko.samsung.com (Sergiu Simmel) Newsgroups: comp.databases Subject: Selecting a commercial RDBMS (Request for suggestions) Keywords: RDBMS Message-ID: <1089@ginosko.samsung.com> Date: 12 May 89 13:12:46 GMT Organization: Samsung Software America, Inc. Lines: 32 I am trying to select a commercial RDBMS product to be used as a back-end for a system we're working on. Here are a few criteria for selection: * RDBMS should have a large enough share of the Unix(tm) RDBMS market; * RDBMS should have a quality (stable, well designed, working, complete) programmatic (3GL) interface (no pre-processors, such as ESQL, required); * RDBMS should run on a variety of hardware platforms (Suns, Pyramids, perhaps DECstations 3100); * company should provide good technical support for 3rd party developers; * company should provide adequate VAR program and support; * RDBMS should have adequate performance; * RDBMS should be compact in size and architecture. Although there is no total order among these criteria, the importance tends to decrease down the list. Assuming that the result of applyting all these restrictions is not null, what product would YOU select if you were me? Please direct responses via e-mail to address below. I will post a summary if relevant responses arrive. Thank you, in anticipation, for your effort and responsiveness. ================================+========================================== Sergiu Saul Simmel | Voice: 508-685-7200 x133 Senior Software Engineer | FAX: 508-685-4940 SAMSUNG Software America, Inc. | Internet: simmel@samsung.com Computing Systems Division | UUCP: simmel@ginosko.UUCP One Corporate Drive | CSNET: samsung.com!simmel@Tektronix.CSNET Andover, MA 01810 | BITNET: samsung.com!simmel@Psuvax1.BITNET ================================+==========================================