Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!agate!hughes@math.Berkeley.EDU
From: hughes@math.Berkeley.EDU (Eric Hughes)
Newsgroups: comp.databases
Subject: Re: Is Novell XQL good ?
Message-ID: <24530@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 17 May 89 22:31:02 GMT
References: <12885@umn-cs.CS.UMN.EDU>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: hughes@math.Berkeley.EDU (Eric Hughes)
Organization: UCB Mathematics Department
Lines: 17
In-reply-to: swie@umn-cs.CS.UMN.EDU (Swie Tsing Tan)

In article <12885@umn-cs.CS.UMN.EDU>, swie@umn-cs (Swie Tsing Tan) writes:
>Does anybody ever use Novell XQL ?
>Could you comment on the product ?
>
>Please e-mail your comment to me directly. Thanks
>swie@umn-cs.cs.umn.edu

Rather than just mail, also post.  I am interested.

I read a piece of their sales literature the other day with a 
lot of hype about "distributed processing" and yet from what
I gathered, the database was located on a single server.  Is
Novell's claim of "distributed database" just marketing hype,
or is their substance to it?

Eric Hughes
hughes@math.berkeley.edu   ucbvax!math!hughes