Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!texsun!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway From: bg0d+@andrew.cmu.edu (Bernard Goldsmith) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Telemail, MCI, AT&T Mail Interconnection! Message-ID: Date: 17 May 89 09:17:54 GMT Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US Lines: 10 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 168, message 4 of 8 I asked MCIMail as soon a s I had read your post. They promised to answer later this week -- I'll be glad to share that reply with you.I've been using MCIMail for about 3 years and ATTMail since last July. I had started with EasyLink, but it was a disaster, even though their special deal with Boston Computer Society promised very low rates. Their billing was riddled with errors and inattention. ATTMail has been disappointing, but its growth has accelerated MCIMail's expansion of services. MCIMail support is MUCH better than ATT's, and the protocol is much more rational.