Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!usc!elroy!cit-vax!tybalt.caltech.edu!bdiscoe
From: bdiscoe@tybalt.caltech.edu (Ben W. Discoe)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics
Subject: Re: X-rated GIF files
Keywords: rude censorship
Message-ID: <10707@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>
Date: 17 May 89 07:29:15 GMT
References: <6138@ux.cs.man.ac.uk> <283@indri.primate.wisc.edu>
Sender: news@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu
Reply-To: bdiscoe@tybalt.caltech.edu.UUCP (Ben W. Discoe)
Distribution: usa
Organization: California Institute of Technology
Lines: 24

In article <283@indri.primate.wisc.edu> bin@primate.wisc.edu writes:
>From article <6138@ux.cs.man.ac.uk>, by arnold@ux.cs.man.ac.uk (Toby Howard):
>> In article <1380@zeus.unl.edu> steimle@zeus.unl.edu (Scott A.) writes:
>>>Does anyone know of any sources for X-rated GIF files?  
>> 
>> Get lost.
>
>Seconded.

What is this, a convention of puritans?  The inquisition?  There are two sides
to pornography, and if it happens to offend you, nobody says you have to see
it!  I'm quite shocked to see a system as <usually> open-minded as the net
cluttered with COMPLETELY useless and inappropriate insults.

When I originally saw this posting, *I* ignored it because "X-rated" is boring,
XX or XXX is more to MY taste.  But I see that there are people of quite
opposite viewpoints who feel the need to blast their trite, most likely
hypocritical insults at a simple, straightforward posting...

The reason I'm bothering to post is because I would also appreciate references
to pornographic GIF files, anon ftp of course, better quality preferred.  If
pornography offends you, THIS newsgroup isn't the place to discuss it!

... Ben Discoe, starving tech student and endangered liberal at large.