Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!apple!bloom-beacon!bu-cs!buengc!bph From: bph@buengc.BU.EDU (Blair P. Houghton) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Posting (was Re: Another silly question) Message-ID: <2905@buengc.BU.EDU> Date: 18 May 89 19:20:03 GMT References: <2459@nmtsun.nmt.edu> <155@mole-end.UUCP> <157@mole-end.UUCP> <941@draken.nada.kth.se> <418@algor2.UUCP> <950@draken.nada.kth.se> <1989May15.215656.15717@ziebmef.uucp> Reply-To: bph@buengc.bu.edu (Blair P. Houghton) Followup-To: comp.lang.c Organization: Boston Univ. Col. of Eng. Lines: 16 In article <1989May15.215656.15717@ziebmef.uucp> stephen@ziebmef.UUCP (Stephen M. Dunn) writes: >[article deleted which says, amongst other things, that we should wait a > couple of days to post replies to simple questions etc] > > How about this: If you feel that the question is _that_ simple that >everyone on the net knows the answer except the person who posted the >original, why not hit r or R and mail a reply to that person only? The obvious answer is: because my ego can't eat just one. How about this: do you really think that I _don't_? Jeez. You oughta see my carbon-copies directory at the end of a day... --Blair "I can feel it inflating even as we speak..."