Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!tektronix!percival!bucket!leonard From: leonard@bucket.UUCP (Leonard Erickson) Newsgroups: comp.lang.pascal Subject: Re: Where are the pascal jobs? Message-ID: <1396@bucket.UUCP> Date: 14 May 89 05:58:50 GMT References: Reply-To: leonard@bucket.UUCP (Leonard Erickson) Distribution: usa Organization: Rick's Home Grown Unix; Portland, OR Lines: 33 In article wjones@andromeda (the ronin) writes: < < I was wondering .. Do any companys in the real world actually use < pascal in programming. I'm responsible for a system of programs that our QA department uses. Around a megabyte of Turbo Pascal source. At the time it was originally set up, they had 3 choices. BASIC (Microsoft BASCOM 2.0) C (Microsoft C 1.0?) Pascal (Turbo Pascal 3.0) They picked Pascal as it was the easiest to maintain (in the sense of being able to drop it into someone's lap and have any hope that they could get up to speed quickly). Unfortunately, the guy who did the original coding was a COBOL programmer and wasn't too familiar with Pascal. So I've been fighting things like 12 *page* procedures for the last four years. Now they want a massive number of improvements all at once and they realize that I can't have it done in the time allotted (partly because I'm lucky to be able to spend 5-10% of my time on coding, due to staff shortages in Micro support) So they've turned it over to the regular DP people who are going write a new set of programs and run them on the VAX. (and the users actually think that they'll be able to get changes implemented faster this way... :-) -- Leonard Erickson ...!tektronix!reed!percival!bucket!leonard CIS: [70465,203] "I'm all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let's start with typewriters." -- Solomon Short