Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!oliveb!sun!sally!plocher
From: plocher%sally@Sun.COM (John Plocher)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Now that someone is talking about Filter ...
Message-ID: <104163@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: 10 May 89 20:33:27 GMT
References: <103736@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <543@targon.UUCP> <606@ispi.UUCP>
Sender: news@sun.Eng.Sun.COM
Reply-To: plocher@sun.UUCP (John Plocher)
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mountain View
Lines: 25

In article Someone writes
>In article Someone writes
>>In article <103736@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> plocher@Sun.Com (John Plocher) writes:
>>>	What is the answer to life, the universe, and everything?
>>42 of course (as all reasonable persons should know :-)
>But only in base 13  :-)

Sigh,

I should have known better.  I have gotten over a dozen replies (mail and
usenet) to my message.  One suggested I join the elm development group
(I did), another suggested using "deliver" since filter didn't do the right
thing (I know that, but thanks for the pointer to "deliver")...

Flame on

BUT ***ALL*** the rest were stupid followups pertaining to the Hitchiker
quote that I specifically said I didn't want answers to!

Flame off

Does ANYONE out here have anything useful to say about the use and misuse
of Reply-xxx: headers?  If you do, please reply.

   -John Plocher