Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!decwrl!nsc!icldata!altos86!dtynan
From: dtynan@altos86.UUCP (Dermot Tynan)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: missing acks
Message-ID: <1087@altos86.UUCP>
Date: 9 May 89 03:04:09 GMT
References: <531@lakart.UUCP>
Organization: Altos, San Jose, CA
Lines: 16

In article <531@lakart.UUCP>, dg@lakart.UUCP (David Goodenough) writes:
>
> Can I assume that he saw packet 1 OK, because he's just acked packet 2? i.e.
> does an ack for packet n count as an ack for all outstanding packets up to n.
>
> 	dg@lakart.UUCP - David Goodenough		+---+

Yes.
The 'ACK' is for all packets up to and including 'N'.

						- Der
-- 
My address:	dtynan@altos86.Altos.COM	(Hopefully!)
Otherwise:	{altnet,amdahl,pyramid,sun}!altos86!dtynan

  ---  "May the blessings of Jeyes Fluid fall upon you"  ---