Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!unmvax!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!harris.cis.ksu.edu!mac From: mac@harris.cis.ksu.edu (Myron A. Calhoun) Newsgroups: comp.org.ieee Subject: Re: PE exam, EIT exam (was: The Title of Engineer) Keywords: Alabama PE Message-ID: <1871@deimos.cis.ksu.edu> Date: 11 May 89 17:03:12 GMT References: <1429PICHER@MAINE> <10429@ihlpb.ATT.COM> <5058@b11.ingr.com> Sender: news@deimos.cis.ksu.edu Reply-To: mac@harris.cis.ksu.edu (Myron A. Calhoun) Distribution: usa Organization: Kansas State University, Dept of Computing & Information Sciences Lines: 18 In article <5058@b11.ingr.com> goodloe@b11.ingr.com (Tony Goodloe) writes: >I was told by one of my professors (who owns a corporation, consulting >of course), that AL requires a corp. having engineering as its main >business, (however you define that), must have a PE on its Board.... The "Academic Positions Open" advertisement from the University of South Alabama in the May, 1989, issue of IEEE Spectrum states "Candidates must .... be willing to obtain the P.E. license." While examining the Auburn (Alabama) University catalog recently (Yes, I'm looking for a new job!) I recall noticing that most of the engineering faculty held the P.E. license. --Myron, B.S., M.S., and Ph.D., all in E.E., but no P.E. by choice! -- Myron A. Calhoun, PhD EE, W0PBV, (913) 532-6350 (work), 539-4448 (home). INTERNET: mac@ksuvax1.cis.ksu.edu BITNET: mac@ksuvax1.bitnet UUCP: ...{rutgers, texbell}!ksuvax1!harry!mac