Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!bbn!spdcc!dyer From: dyer@spdcc.COM (Steve Dyer) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs Subject: Re: Server hardware/software query Message-ID: <3232@ursa-major.SPDCC.COM> Date: 13 May 89 00:27:24 GMT References: <11677@duorion.cair.du.edu> Reply-To: dyer@ursa-major.spdcc.COM (Steve Dyer) Distribution: usa Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA Lines: 41 In article <11677@duorion.cair.du.edu> bshafer@du.edu (Bob Shafer) writes: >We are looking at the possibility of using NFS for software >distribution to networked PC's in student labs in a building on >our campus and have a few questions. > 1) [VaxStations] > 2) We might be able to shake loose an IBM RT model 125 or > 135 with plenty of memory and disk. The problem here > is the operating system software. AIX 2.2.1 is > immature and AOS (IBM's BSD 4.3) is not a complete > implementation of 4.3. Both have NFS. We have no > experience with NFS on AIX. Our experience with NFS on > AOS seems to indicate that it is based on an older > version of NFS. First, I think you're obsessing too much over this. A MicroVax II would do fine. An RT 125 or 135 would do even better. Write back in a few months and tell us how wonderful this advise was. I must correct some misrepresentations about NFS and AOS 4.3. First, it's about as "complete" as port of 4.3 as I can imagine. OK, Franz Lisp and Berkeley Pascal aren't there. Jeez. The NFS code in AOS 4.3 is based on Sun's NFS 3.2 OEM package for 4.3BSD integrators. NFS 3.2 is **NOT** the NFS from Sun OS 3.2. I don't know of a later version. Project Athena at MIT has been using MicroVAXes, VAX 750s and RT PCs (125), successfully for almost two years now as file servers, based on the slightly older Sun NFS 3.0 OEM distribution, which was originally integrated into the 4.3 kernel by U Wisconsin (VAX), and RT (Brown). I have not compared the recent AOS 4.3 releas