Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!amdcad!rpw3 From: rpw3@amdcad.AMD.COM (Rob Warnock) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: Re: FDDI/Soderblum(?) Message-ID: <25666@amdcad.AMD.COM> Date: 17 May 89 20:12:04 GMT References: <8905151730.AA06800@vax.ftp.com> <13082@ut-emx.UUCP> Reply-To: rpw3@amdcad.UUCP (Rob Warnock) Organization: [Consultant] San Mateo, CA Lines: 46 In article <13082@ut-emx.UUCP> bud@emx.UUCP (C. E. "Bud" Spurgeon) writes: +--------------- | Ethernet is patented. Xerox has two patents on the system from 1975. +--------------- Quite true. One is on collision detection (any form of CSMA/CD), and the other is on repeaters which know about collision detection. Also note that 1975 + 17 = 1992. That is, they're still in force. +--------------- | The IEEE802.3 specs note that "The Xerox Corporation has assured the | IEEE that it is willing to grant a license under these patents on | reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms and conditions to anyone | wishing to obtain such a license." | I assume Xerox decided to let the technology out without hassling | anyone for royalties. I've never heard of someone getting an Ethernet | license from Xerox. Does anyone bother to do so, one wonders? +--------------- Well, *honest* people did & do! ;-} After all, I would say the terms are quite "reasonable and nondiscriminatory" -- a $1000 one-time license fee per patent per manufacturer (i.e. $2000 total). +--------------- | In article <8905151730.AA06800@vax.ftp.com> stev@VAX.FTP.COM writes: > | > ... can you imagine a world where every ethernet | >board had a royality paid on it? or every RS232 port? +--------------- Yes, and Ethernet wouldn't have succeeded nearly as well. Thankfully, Xerox wanted Etehrnet to succeed more than they wanted to grub a few bucks. As a result, they probably sold a *lot* more Ethernet components than they would if it had been more restricted. Though note, at one point, the patent license fee for building *anything* that sat on a DEC Unibus was $100 or 10% of retail (whichever was less) *per copy*, that is, per board that plugged into a Unibus. The add-on market grumbled, but paid. There was a thriving market in Unibus peripherals... Rob Warnock Systems Architecture Consultant UUCP: {amdcad,fortune,sun}!redwood!rpw3 DDD: (415)572-2607 USPS: 627 26th Ave, San Mateo, CA 94403