Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tank!ncar!boulder!uswat!reuse!ken
From: ken@reuse.USWEST.COM (Kenny A. Chaffin)
Newsgroups: comp.society.futures
Subject: Re: NEW COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES: sci.commtech update
Keywords: sci.commtech, technology
Message-ID: <233@reuse.USWEST.COM>
Date: 16 May 89 17:18:09 GMT
References: <4132@bgsuvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: ken@reuse.UUCP (Kenny A. Chaffin)
Distribution: comp.society.futures
Organization: U S WEST Advanced Technologies, Denver, CO
Lines: 26

In article <4132@bgsuvax.UUCP> klopfens@bgsuvax.UUCP (Bruce Klopfenstein) writes:
>
>For those of you interested in the sci.commtech call for discussion:
>
>There has been some discussion about the name, with sci.comm.tech being
>a common suggestion; Usenet authorities tell me sci.commtech is better
>as the former implies a second heirarchy.  Another good suggestion is
>to call the group sci.infotech.  Please post your reactions to news.groups,
                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>and watch for a call for a vote in the next couple of weeks.
>
>Thanks for your interest, and those who have an opinion which has not
>yet been expressed, I encourage you to post as soon as possible.
>
>Thanks.

My feeling is that sci.infotech would be more appropriate. this would
allow discussion of communications technologies under the umbrella
of information technology etc.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Kenny A. Chaffin                           ...uswat!reuse!ken
U S WEST Advanced Technologies                (303) 930-5356
6200 South Quebec
Denver, CO 80231
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<