Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!WVNVM.WVNET.EDU!U1DF1
From: U1DF1@WVNVM.WVNET.EDU ("John Neubert")
Newsgroups: comp.society.futures
Subject: res-request Dynabook...
Message-ID: <8905191309.AA00923@multimax.encore.com>
Date: 19 May 89 13:07:56 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 10

Let's be careful here.  I'm not at all sure we're talking of the same
things here.  If memory serves me, the *product* WAS called Dynabook,
leadind to the controversy (I think they've registered the name).
However, the company's name was NOT Dynabook.  I also do not believe
it was located in the same place.  In that case we may be talking
about two separate comapnaies with two separate products -- not
necessarily related products.  I would suggest the original inquirer
either answer the ad, or just call the company and ask.  And then,
please let the list know so we really *know* what we're talking about
instaed of guessing.