Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!kddlab!titcca!sragwa!wsgw!socslgw!diamond!diamond
From: diamond@diamond.csl.sony.junet (Norman Diamond)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: open() prototype
Message-ID: <10244@socslgw.csl.sony.JUNET>
Date: 12 May 89 09:22:45 GMT
References: <2775@cps3xx.UUCP> <12864@haddock.ima.isc.com> <1528@mcgill-vision.UUCP> <10249@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Sender: news@csl.sony.JUNET
Reply-To: diamond@csl.sony.junet (Norman Diamond)
Organization: Sony Computer Science Laboratory Inc., Tokyo, Japan
Lines: 19

In article <10249@smoke.BRL.MIL> gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn) writes:

>Implementors should declare open() in <fcntl.h> as follows:

>#if __STDC__
>	extern int open( const char *, int, ... );
>#else
>	extern int open();
>#endif

You mean implementors should implement new C-language systems
(library etc.) that are not necessarily ANSI conformant?
This is obviously a mistake.  :-)

--
Norman Diamond, Sony Computer Science Lab (diamond%csl.sony.co.jp@relay.cs.net)
  The above opinions are my own.   |  Why are programmers criticized for
  If they're also your opinions,   |  re-implementing the wheel, when car
  you're infringing my copyright.  |  manufacturers are praised for it?