Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!polyslo!dorourke
From: dorourke@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (David M. O'Rourke)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Apple System 7.0
Message-ID: <11289@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU>
Date: 11 May 89 18:19:11 GMT
References: <17148@usc.edu> <47846@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <17152@usc.edu> <47912@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <6828@cbmvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: dorourke@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (David M. O'Rourke)
Organization: Cal Poly State University -- San Luis Obispo
Lines: 19

In article <6828@cbmvax.UUCP> andy@cbmvax.UUCP (Andy Finkel) writes:
>Even with reactions like yours, I still prefer letting the development
>community know about the directions the system software is taking.
>
>Once again, we've made no promises on ship date for 1.4.  If you think
>differently, you are confused.

  What's the difference between this and what Apple, IBM, or any other
company has done in the past.  Apple gets flamed for pre-annoucing
system software, and then the same people turn around and justify the
same action for their own machine.

  Oh well.  I've yet to see a perfect computer, and doubt I will in my
life time.  6 of 1, half dozen of the other.
-- 
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\|/////////////////////////////////////////
David M. O'Rourke____________________|_____________dorourke@polyslo.calpoly.edu
|       It's only 1's & 0's, so how difficult can Computer Science be?        |
|:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::|