Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!husc6!bloom-beacon!apple!amdahl!kevin From: kevin@uts.amdahl.com (Kevin Clague) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Way to go, CBM advertising! (and a silly wish for 1.4) Keywords: magazine, ads, congrats Message-ID: Date: 13 May 89 15:58:37 GMT References: <2796@cuuxb.ATT.COM> Reply-To: kevin@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com (Kevin Clague) Distribution: na Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 Lines: 25 In article <2796@cuuxb.ATT.COM> migh@cuuxb.ATT.COM (~XT6510300~Mike Hall~C24~M26a~6029~) writes: > >(OK, for the silly wish: could we have a WriteRastLine(rp, x, y, n, buf) >subroutine that might effectively replace a whole bunch of >WritePixel(rp, x, y, p) calls? And maybe even a WriteRastColumn(...) >for spectrogram type stuff. >Would there be any benefit in putting it "your" code versus in "our" code? >Thanks!) > >Mike Hall I asked Dale Luck for this a year or two ago. Yes. There would be a good performance advantage to doing it this way. I believe Dale implemented this for 1.4. I think that he implemented a horizontal and vertical version of the routines. Is this correct Dale? Kevin -- UUCP: kevin@uts.amdahl.com or: {sun,decwrl,hplabs,pyramid,seismo,oliveb}!amdahl!kevin DDD: 408-737-5481 USPS: Amdahl Corp. M/S 249, 1250 E. Arques Av, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 [ Any thoughts or opinions which may or may not have been expressed ] [ herein are my own. They are not necessarily those of my employer. ]