Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bbn!apple!sun-barr!ames!pasteur!agate!ucbvax!UTCVM.BITNET!JWANKERL
From: JWANKERL@UTCVM.BITNET ("Josef W. Wankerl")
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: JMP/JML differences
Message-ID: <8905110216.aa04809@SMOKE.BRL.MIL>
Date: 11 May 89 06:10:45 GMT
References: <bungia!orbit!pnet51!shawn@UMN-CS.CS.UMN.EDU>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 24

On Wed, 10 May 89 21:25:18 GMT Shawn Stanley said:
>One of the forms of the JMP instruction is the absolute indirect.  The JML
>instruction has *only* the absolute indirect.  For example:
>
>JMP (address)
>JML (address)
>
>The address must be 16 bits.  However, the JMP instruction assumes bank zero
>for the destination address.  In both cases, the address specified is taken
Bank zero???  I think not.  The JMP would branch execution within the
same bank the code is executing, not bank zero.  Either that or the
programs I've written are not working.  :-)

>UUCP: {uunet!rosevax, amdahl!bungia, chinet, killer}!orbit!pnet51!shawn
>INET: shawn@pnet51.cts.com

  -Gonzo

/**********************************************************************\
|*  Joe "Gonzo" Wankerl          |*|                                  *|
|*                               |*|   The views expressed here are   *|
|* BitNet =>  JWANKERL@UTCVM     |*|   not necessarily yours...       *|
|*                               |*|   ...but they should be.         *|
\**********************************************************************/