Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!apple!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!pro-harvest.UUCP!edward From: edward@pro-harvest.UUCP (System Administrator) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: How do you do DVORAK? Message-ID: <8905130837.AA13919@crash.cts.com> Date: 9 May 89 14:50:29 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: pnet01!pro-sol!pro-newfrontier!pro-nfmail01!pro-nfmail01!pro-harvest!edward@nosc.mil Organization: The Internet Lines: 28 Network Comment: to #487 by obsolete!portal!cup.portal.com!Sirald%uunet.uu.net >worth the confusion. In other words, if you EVER need to >use QWERTY on a regular basis, it isn't worth the time of >the mistakes made with DVORAK as your native type. I've encountered that problem, myself. I am forced to use a Macintosh when laying out the club newsletter, and the only keyboard arrangement available is Qwerty. "Hunt-and-peck" is a kind way to describe my typing style during these sessions; fortunately, they're brief. Rarely does anyone other than myself use my computers, and I rarely (with the above exception) use anyone else's, so sticking with Dvorak isn't much of a problem. >There's another point to consider. DVORAK is not >widely supported enough by Apple software. Diagnostic There is only one piece of Apple software with which the Dvorak layout was a problem (to me), and that was Roger Wagner's Macromate. I could input the macros correctly, but when they were replayed, the translation was wrong. Incredibly weird strings would be output unless the keyboard layout had been changed to "U.S.A." I reported the bug, and was shortly rewarded with a new version that worked correctly with Dvorak. So at the moment, I'm happy, and I haven't discovered any new incompatibilities with the software that I use. ProLine: edward@pro-harvest | pro-harvest +1 312 253 8239 UUCP: crash!pro-harvest!edward | 24 hour operation ARPA: crash!pro-harvest!edward@nosc.mil | 300/1200/2400 bps InterNet: edward@pro-harvest.cts.com | Online since 1 April 1989