Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!rutgers!bellcore!clyde!watmath!watdragon!rose!trgauchat From: trgauchat@rose.waterloo.edu (Terry Gauchat) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: QNX Operating System Keywords: operating system Message-ID: <13796@watdragon.waterloo.edu> Date: 13 May 89 03:13:42 GMT References: <634@pmafire.UUCP> <13739@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <5000@mnetor.UUCP> <7190@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> Sender: daemon@watdragon.waterloo.edu Reply-To: trgauchat@rose.waterloo.edu (Terry Gauchat) Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 36 In article <7190@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> dhesi@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Rahul Dhesi) writes: >In article <5000@mnetor.UUCP> frank@mnetor.UUCP (Frank Kolnick) writes: >>>>...costs $450. >... >>Our consulting comapny has been using QNX for a couple of years, and >>it is hands down the best choice for a distributed, real-time system... > >So far as I can tell, QNX costs $450 or so minimum. Could you, or >somebody else, convince the company to sell it for $60 or so in a >minimum configuration? At that price I would buy it just to experiment An excellent suggestion -- it all depends, once again, on Quantums's marketing strategy. They may not wish every average user to give it a try -- that would make QNX a real MS-DOS threat! If they had a cheaper price, then with even more users, software producers (like Lotus, WordPerfect) would gladly prepare QNX versions of their software, thus eliminating common user complaints with respect to a new OS -- and in turn more people would buy QNX ... OS/2 has software company support, however, due to the influence of Microsoft and IBM. How much does IT sell for anyway? (I guess not too much, but machine upgrade requirements are a bigger discouragement than QNX's cost!) With a cheaper price, Quantum may not be able to provide their reputable super support anymore... .... P.S. Has anyone use UNIX WordPerfect yet? I am terribly curious! .... Terry Gauchat MicroCosmic Computer Services.