Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!orstcs!romana.cs.orst.edu!gatesl From: gatesl@romana.cs.orst.edu (Lee Ryan Gates) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Info on HD-Controller PS-180 ? Message-ID: <10651@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU> Date: 16 May 89 07:41:23 GMT Sender: usenet@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU Reply-To: gatesl@romana.cs.orst.edu (Lee Ryan Gates) Organization: Oregon State Univ. -- Computer Science Lines: 31 >In article <1349@laura.UUCP> st%trillian.irb@unido.UUCP (Stefan Timphus) writes >>Has anybody experience with a Harddisk-Controller called >>PS-180 or Perstor-180. >>It is advertised to format a Seagate ST-4096 to 146 MB (instead of 80). > >.. I have a PS-180 using a Seagate 4096 on our BBS system on an AT >clone. Runs very very well. Kinda of a pain to setup. Very time consuming >and the docs are marginal. But it does work. Gives about 123mb instead of >146 as advertisded, but that was not a problem for us, as 123 is still MUCH >better than 80mb. >You will need some sort of utility like Ontrack Disk Manager to >effectivly use the entire disk as a single drive. >Speed is pretty good, and reliability has been excellent. >we have been running for about 6 months now, with NO problems. Um, wouldn't that be only a little better than a normal RLL drive? I have been looking into getting a RLL controller for some time now, and the Perstor advertises 90% storage increase with a 2:1 interleave. If you were to get something like an Adaptec or DTC 1:1 interleave board, you could get aproximately 120mb (if only a few hard errors). Then with those, you can get upwards of 650 kb/s transfer rate. Given that the ARLL board has that many problems getting up to the expected 90% storage increase, I would (am going to) consider getting the RLL drive because there won't be many errors due to the board, and the high transfer rate. just some thoughts, lee ** 'must be Oregon, look there's another person with rust on 'em.' gates@romana.cs.orst.edu 'anybody got a job for an aspiring cs undergrad?' :-)