Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:28963 comp.sys.amiga:34001
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!ames!ncar!noao!asuvax!hrc!gtephx!ellisond
From: ellisond@gtephx.UUCP (Dell Ellison)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: OS/2 vs AmigaDOS
Summary: Oh ...
Message-ID: <43425fd4.190fc@gtephx.UUCP>
Date: 16 May 89 17:18:10 GMT
References: <5664@microsoft.UUCP> <6793@cbmvax.UUCP> <2948@rti.UUCP>
Organization: AG Communication Systems, Phoenix, Arizona
Lines: 11

In article <2948@rti.UUCP>, bcw@rti.UUCP (Bruce Wright) writes:
> In article <6793@cbmvax.UUCP>, daveh@cbmvax.UUCP (Dave Haynie) writes:
> > Of course, I have yet to hear complaints about OS/2 being too fast...
> 
> I have *NEVER* heard anyone complain because their {machine, operating
> system} was too fast!  (buggy code in process control systems excepted).
> Even the people using the Cray think it's a pretty good machine but 
> needs to be a bit faster ...

Bruce, I am sure that Dave wrote that with a little bit of sarcasm with
the intention of meaning that OS/2 was not terribly fast.