Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!ames!ncar!umigw!umbio!medsoft!rkaplan
From: rkaplan@medsoft.uucp (Richard Kaplan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Info on HD-Controller PS-180 ?
Message-ID: <284.246D73BD@medsoft.uucp>
Date: 14 May 89 12:48:20 GMT
Organization: Medical Software Exchange BBS FidoNet 1:135/3 (305) 325-8709
Lines: 24


 KE>From: keithe@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Keith Ericson) 
 KE>Date: 10 May 89 20:16:11 GMT 
 KE>Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton,  OR. 
 KE>Message-ID: <5112@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM> 
 KE>Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc 
 
 KE>I evaluated the Perstore "ARLL" (Advanced RLL) controller and 
 KE>decided against it in favor of (an Adaptec) standard RLL that 
 KE>can achieve a 1:1 interleave and hence higher transfer rate  
 
What you say is true, but I believe the original author was 
concerned with disk capacity.  If this is one's priority in 
selecting a controller,   then an ARLL controller is best 
for the job. 
 
 


--  
Richard Kaplan - via FidoNet node 1:135/3
Medical Software Exchange BBS (305) 325-8709
UUCP: ...uunet!gould!umbio!medsoft!rkaplan
ARPA: rkaplan@medsoft.uucp