Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!jth90342
From: jth90342@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: are quantum (Apple) disks bad news?
Message-ID: <111900062@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 10 May 89 22:31:00 GMT
References: <4254@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu>
Lines: 8
Nf-ID: #R:ucdavis.ucdavis.edu:4254:uxa.cso.uiuc.edu:111900062:000:368
Nf-From: uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!jth90342    May 10 17:31:00 1989



You have been informed wrong.  I have used many Quantum drives and have been impressed with their speed and reliability.  The 80Meg Quantum is probably a better bet than the 40 though, since the 80 has an on controller cache that speeds 
throughput.  In 40 Megs, the Quantum is good, but the Conner drive is probably
better...

Jeff Huber
jth890342@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu