Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!unido!fauern!immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de!eckert From: eckert@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Toerless Eckert) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sequent Subject: Re: note on top for Sequent Message-ID: <255@medusa.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Date: 11 May 89 13:01:08 GMT References: Organization: IMMD IV, University of Erlangen, W-Germany Lines: 32 From article , by rich@sendai.sendai.ann-arbor.mi.us (K. Richard Magill): > In article <13274@paris.ics.uci.edu> nagel@beaver.ics.uci.edu (Mark Nagel) writes: > > It was pointed out to me that there is an error in top.local.h for the > sequent -- VMUNIX should be defined as /dynix not /vmunix. > > Many makefiles use the heuristic that the presence of /vmunix means > a berkeley machine. So many, in fact, that long ago I did a "ln -s > /dynix /vmunix". Solved a number of headaches. I have tried to compile top2.5 on a Sequent Symmetry S81, but it fails: - cc -c -O -DTable_size=449 -DDefault_TOPN=-1 -DDefault_DELAY=1 top.c - cc -O -c display.c - cc -O -c kernel.c - "kernel.c", line 114: p_addr undefined - "kernel.c", line 114: member of structure or union required - "display.c", line 266: CPUSTATES undefined - "display.c", line 288: CPUSTATES undefined - "display.c", line 304: CPUSTATES undefined - "display.c", line 542: p_tsize undefined - "display.c", line 542: member of structure or union required - "top.c", line 1180: p_tsize undefined - "top.c", line 1180: member of structure or union required - "top.c", line 1181: member of structure or union required Can someone please tell me what i am doing wrong ? - It seems that everone else has succeeded in compiling top on a sequent, or is there only a better version of top than 2.5 ?? Toerless Eckert (eckert@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de)