Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!GINGER.BERKELEY.EDU!mcgrath%tully.Berkeley.EDU
From: mcgrath%tully.Berkeley.EDU@GINGER.BERKELEY.EDU (Roland McGrath)
Newsgroups: gnu.utils.bug
Subject: ls still incompatible
Message-ID: <8905132120.AA03568@tully.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 13 May 89 21:20:42 GMT
Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Distribution: gnu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 6

The -D flag added in GNU ls 1.5 doesn't do the right thing.

The only change I wanted was that if `foo' is a symlink to
directory `bar', and I say "ls foo", I want it to act as if
I said "ls bar".  Adding a flag for this is OK.
The -D flag implies -L, which I don't want.