Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ukma!rutgers!netsys!jsheese!jeffery
From: jeffery@jsheese.FIDONET.ORG (Jeff Sheese)
Newsgroups: news.misc
Subject: Re: net abbreviations
Summary: a test of the references line in this message
Keywords: test, references line
Message-ID: <78.246C7CA8@jsheese.FIDONET.ORG>
Date: 13 May 89 18:59:20 GMT
References: <10243@socslgw.csl.sony.JUNET>
Reply-To: jeffery@jsheese.Fidonet.ORG
Followup-To: news.misc
Organization: JStek Enterprises - Frederick, MD
Lines: 27

In an article of <12 May 89 09:19:15 GMT>, diamond@diamond.csl.sony.junet  
(Norman Diamond) writes:

 >--
 >Norman Diamond, Sony Computer Science Lab 
 >(diamond%csl.sony.co.jp@relay.cs.net)
 >  The above opinions are my own.   |  Why are programmers criticized for
 >  If they're also your opinions,   |  re-implementing the wheel, when car
 >  you're infringing my copyright.  |  manufacturers are praised for it?

The only reason I'm replying to the above message is to test a new software  
feature.  Until today my news editor did not support the References line.  I  
made a few configuration changes.

Could someone test the validity of all the header lines starting with  
'Reply-to'?  If those header lines are valid, please send e-mail.  If they  
don't work, don't send mail.  Please do not respond to this message in this  
newsgroup.

Thanks in advance.

--  
Jeff Sheese - via FidoNet node 1:109/116
UUCP: ...!netsys!jsheese!jeffery
ARPA: jeffery@jsheese.FIDONET.ORG
(I am sole owner.  My opinions represent my company.)
(Send all flames to null@jsheese.Fidonet.ORG)