Xref: utzoo news.groups:9427 comp.lsi.cad:167 sci.electronics:6157
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!indri!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!leah!rpi!crdgw1!ge-dab!ge-rtp!edison!rja
From: rja@edison.GE.COM (rja)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.lsi.cad,sci.electronics
Subject: Re: CAD/CAM/CAE newsgroup proposal
Message-ID: <1939@edison.GE.COM>
Date: 3 May 89 12:51:32 GMT
References: <10542@rama.UUCP> <208@aob.aob.mn.org> <566@corpane.UUCP>
Organization: GE-Fanuc North America
Lines: 13

In article <566@corpane.UUCP>, sparks@corpane.UUCP (John Sparks) writes:

> So if we do make a CAD group let's start with ONE group such as
> comp.cad.general and let the traffic build for a while and see how many
> directions teh discussions start taking. Then if need be, we can always
> petition to create sub groups as they are needed.

The net.custom would be to create comp.cad or comp.cad.misc first.

I personally favor the latter name, but most of my concerns about the
flattening of the namespace are ignored anyway...

rja@edison.cho.ge.com