Path: utzoo!yunexus!telly!eci386!clewis From: clewis@eci386.uucp (Chris Lewis) Newsgroups: tor.news Subject: Re: mail through UofT Message-ID: <1989May16.175732.4280@eci386.uucp> Date: 16 May 89 17:57:32 GMT Article-I.D.: eci386.1989May16.175732.4280 References: <1989May14.165359.21028@telly.on.ca> <1989May14.191801.18773@tmsoft.uucp> <1989May15.234059.29449@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> Reply-To: clewis@eci386.UUCP (Chris Lewis) Distribution: tor Organization: R. H. Lathwell Associates: Elegant Communications, Inc. Lines: 58 In article <1989May15.234059.29449@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> molnar@gpu.utcs.UUCP (Tom Molnar) writes: >In article <1989May14.191801.18773@tmsoft.uucp> mason@tmsoft.UUCP (Dave Mason) writes: > ># >2) I thought UofT also talks to uunet. If the waterloo connection is so ># > good, why bother? ># My understanding is that UofT does not want to be the local mail hub ># any more than they already are. > >Correct. I'm sure you can appreciate why. On average, utgpu handles >~3000 message a day. One evening I decided to poke through the logs to >see what the traffic pattern was. I was surprised to see that for that >particular day, only 20% of the traffic was either to or from a UofT mailbox, >the rest was gatewayed mail. Naturally that covered only a single 24 hour >period, but the discovery was interesting nonetheless. Out of curiousity, I went through the u.can.on.? files looking for uunet connectivity: jtsv16 uunet(HOURLY/2) dptcdc uunet(HOURLY/2) bdofed uunet(DEMAND) attcan uunet(EVENING) mitel uunet(DEMAND) mnetor uunet(DEMAND+HIGH) pantor uunet(DEMAND) paqs1 uunet(DEMAND) simware uunet(DEMAND) watmath uunet(DEDICATED) utai uunet(HOURLY/2) Assigning numeric costs to some of the symbols, we get: DEDICATED 200 DEMAND 300 HOURLY 500 EVENING 1800 This has always confused me, since I thought attcan had graciously expressed willingness to forward mail to and from uunet, and attcan has the worst cost in the list! We've always had watmath declared dead, so we didn't get caught by their change to DEDICATED. Considering how well U of T is connected locally, is it any wonder that U of T ends up forwarding everything? Without extra hacking around with a local path file, almost every entry in our path file has "utai!uunet" in it. Incidentally, most of the DEMAND entries were inserted by uunet personnel. Anyways, I'm going to reinsert attcan uunet(0) into my path.local file and have done with it. -- --------------------------------- Chris Lewis, R.H. Lathwell & Associates: Elegant Communications Inc. UUCP: {uunet!mnetor, utcsri!utzoo}!lsuc!gate!eci386!clewis Phone: (416)-595-5425