Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!bu-cs!bloom-beacon!think!barmar
From: barmar@think.COM (Barry Margolin)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Problem with ()?():() as ending test in for-loop
Message-ID: <20658@news.Think.COM>
Date: 24 May 89 18:14:28 GMT
References: <1200@liszt.kulesat.uucp>
Sender: news@Think.COM
Reply-To: barmar@kulla.think.com.UUCP (Barry Margolin)
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 32

In article <1200@liszt.kulesat.uucp> vanpetegem@liszt.kulesat.uucp writes:
>The code with which I am in trouble, goes as follows:
>
>	 for(n = 1;  ((n % 10) ? (k > 2) : (n < 100));  n++)
>                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>           {
>             ..... (in some expressions k is changed, depending on n)
>	   }
>
>What I want to do is simply perform the test (k > 2) as ending test for the
>"for-loop", except in the cases where n is dividable by 10. In the latter
>situation the test (n < 100) has to be done.

The sense of the test clause of your :? expression is wrong.  When n
is divisible by 10, (n % 10) is 0, and 0 represents "false" in C.  I
would write your end test as

	((n % 10) == 0) ? (k > 2) : (n < 100)

although "real C programmers" would probably write it as

	(n % 10) ? (n < 100) : (k > 2)

i.e. they would just interchange the true and false clauses, taking
advantage of the fact that the result of the % can be used as a
boolean.

Barry Margolin
Thinking Machines Corp.

barmar@think.com
{uunet,harvard}!think!barmar