Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!uflorida!haven!mimsy!chris
From: chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Problem with ()?():() as ending test in for-loop
Message-ID: <17722@mimsy.UUCP>
Date: 24 May 89 14:47:04 GMT
References: <1200@liszt.kulesat.uucp>
Organization: U of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science, Coll. Pk., MD 20742
Lines: 29

In article <1200@liszt.kulesat.uucp> vanpetegem@liszt.kulesat.uucp writes:
>I have a problem with VAX C V2.4-026 under VMS V5.0-2.

>	 for(n = 1;  ((n % 10) ? (k > 2) : (n < 100));  n++)

>... When n becomes equal to 10 the "for-loop" is stopped already.
>So I think neither the first nor the second test is evaluated and only
>(n % 10) is taken into account (the first test (k > 2) is only important
>for n taking values from 50 on).

It sounds as though you have found a bug in the compiler.  The large
`for' expression should evaluate to either 1 or 0: if (n % 10) is
nonzero, the result is 1 iff k > 2; otherwise, the result is 1 iff n <
100.  You should look at the assembly produced by the compiler to see
whether the compiler simply `forgot' to generate parts of the
expression---for instance, it may have produced

	n % 10 && k > 2

instead.  If so, rewriting the test as

	((n % 10) != 0 && k > 2) || n < 100

will probably get around the bug.  (Any valid `logical' [true/false]
e1?e2:e3 expression can always be transformed this way into (e1&&e2)||e3,
provided e3 has no side effects.)
-- 
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7163)
Domain:	chris@mimsy.umd.edu	Path:	uunet!mimsy!chris