Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!haven!mimsy!chris
From: chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: still problems with ?:
Keywords: a final try, Chris?
Message-ID: <17791@mimsy.UUCP>
Date: 30 May 89 19:24:19 GMT
References: <17722@mimsy.UUCP> <344.nlhp3@oracle.nl> <17757@mimsy.UUCP> <2632@solo1.cs.vu.nl>
Organization: U of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science, Coll. Pk., MD 20742
Lines: 13

[me:]
>>But e1?e2:e3 *can* be turned into (e1&&e2 || !e1&&e3)

In article <2632@solo1.cs.vu.nl> maart@cs.vu.nl (Maarten Litmaath) writes:
>But what if e1 == *p++?

In the original bogus article (<17722@mimsy.UUCP> [someday to be
mimsy.umd.edu]) I included various conditions, such as `no side
effects' and `used in a boolean context'.  I figured these were obvious
enough in the followup not to require another explication. . . .
-- 
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7163)
Domain:	chris@mimsy.umd.edu	Path:	uunet!mimsy!chris