Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!texsun!texbell!root
From: root@texbell.swbt.com (greg)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: bad address problem
Keywords: force header reedit
Message-ID: <973@texbell.swbt.com>
Date: 29 May 89 19:07:15 GMT
References: <3283@cs.dal.ca>
Reply-To: root@texbell.UUCP (Greg Hackney)
Organization: texbell gateway, Dallas
Lines: 14

In article <3283@cs.dal.ca> silvert@cs.dal.ca (Bill Silvert) writes:
>A common problem for our machine is that ELM extracts incorrect
>return addresses.

In config.h, try undefining NOCHECK_VALIDNAME and DONT_TOUCH_ADDRESSES,
and defining OPTIMIZE_RETURN. Then, play with USE_EMBEDDED_ADDRESSES
to see which works the best for you.

Also, you might check your mail transport program to see if it likes
the addresses. With sendmail, you can type "/usr/lib/sendmail -bv -v ADDRESS",
and with smail, "/bin/smail -A ADDRESS".
-- 
Greg        Internet: hack@texbell.swbt.com         Southwestern Bell
Hackney     UUCP: {rutgers,bellcore}!texbell!hack   Telephone Company