Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!usc!randvax!ucla-an!hermix!lance
From: lance@hermix.UUCP (Lance Ellinghouse)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: map problems [Too many chiefs, not enough...]
Summary: chief in CA vs. chief in TX
Message-ID: <291@hermix.UUCP>
Date: 30 May 89 19:49:17 GMT
References: <249@vector.Dallas.TX.US> <23228@dhw68k.cts.com>
Organization: Mark V Systems, Ltd., Encino, Ca.
Lines: 19


To clarify everything I decided to post here instead of sending lots
of little messages all over the place.

chief in TX gave up the systems name chief to the chief in CA about 
1 - 1.5 years ago. 

I am the Sysadmin for chief in CA. I did not relize that I had not included
a #W line. Sorry. I will update it when I get a chance.

I don't know why it still shows up in TX.

Lance Ellinghouse

-- 
Lance Ellinghouse
Mark V Systems, Ltd.
UUCP: ...!hermix!lance
ARPA: ucla-an!hermix!lance@ee.UCLA.EDU