Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!triceratops.cis.ohio-state.edu!karl
From: karl@triceratops.cis.ohio-state.edu (Karl Kleinpaste)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Domains vs. Routing (was Re: rewriting FROM: lines)
Message-ID: <KARL.89May31145029@triceratops.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Date: 31 May 89 18:50:29 GMT
References: <31051@sri-unix.SRI.COM> <160@zebra.UUCP> <6982@cbnews.ATT.COM> <882@adobe.UUCP>
Sender: news@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Organization: OSU
Lines: 11
In-reply-to: greid@adobe.com's message of 31 May 89 18:25:46 GMT

greid@adobe.com writes:
   The bangity!bangity!user stuff is pretty crude, but it was very
   reliable in terms of reversing the path and getting mail returned to
   the sender.

I respectfullly disagree.  I refer you to the footnote in my previous
posting regarding non-reversability of paths going through my archive
machine osu-cis as used by anonymous UUCP accessors.  Bidirectional
links are *not* universal.  They never have been.

--Karl