Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!blake!ndsuvax!ncoverby From: ncoverby@ndsuvax.UUCP (Glen Overby) Newsgroups: comp.os.minix Subject: Re: Atari ST Minix Summary: NO! Message-ID: <2692@ndsuvax.UUCP> Date: 24 May 89 17:10:17 GMT References: <811@rex.cs.tulane.edu> <2569@ast.cs.vu.nl> <18697@cup.portal.com> Reply-To: ncoverby@ndsuvax.UUCP (Glen Overby) Organization: North Dakota State University, Fargo Lines: 14 In article <18697@cup.portal.com> BUGGS@cup.portal.com (William Edward JuneJr) writes: >Is the minix conf. EVER gonna be split into they're seperate systems? I hope not. I hope Minix continues to be similar enough across ALL machines that discussions about what is happening with the implimentation on one machine is applicable to ALL machines. Thats called a Portable Operating System :-) The only split I would support would be a moderated sources group and an unmoderated discussion group, but that doesn't seem likeley at this point. -- Glen Overby uunet!ndsuvax!ncoverby (UUCP) ncoverby@ndsuvax (Bitnet)