Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!shlump.dec.com!jfcl.dec.com!bradcj From: bradcj@jfcl.dec.com (Brad C. Johnson) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kerberos Subject: Porting Kerberos to VMS Keywords: porting, portability, vms, kerberos, athena Message-ID: <497@jfcl.dec.com> Date: 23 May 89 19:52:04 GMT Reply-To: bradcj@jfcl.nac.dec.com.UUCP (Brad C. Johnson) Distribution: usa Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Lines: 53 I am in the process of evaluating the effort to port Kerberos. There are two general areas of my evaluation: first, in general, how much effort is involved in general portability issues (e.g., compiler dependencies, system dependencies, UNI*X dependencies, etc.); and second, specifically, how much effort would be required to port the code to a VMS system -- yow! If anyone has information, insight, comments, or suggestions on this issue, please get in touch with me. Thanks in advance. In the short time I've been evaluating the code, these are the types of issues that I've identified (in porting it to VMS): Note: These are not derogatory remarks on Kerberos, rather just a list of things that would have to be addressed to port the software to VMS. Compilation: cc vs. VAX C - #include syntax is different in some ways (e.g.,