Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!hp4nl!phigate!prle!prles2!cstw01!meulenbr
From: meulenbr@cstw01.prl.philips.nl (Frans Meulenbroeks)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.games.bugs
Subject: Re: Wanderer!
Message-ID: <492@prles2.UUCP>
Date: 26 May 89 09:06:03 GMT
References: <283@poppy.warwick.ac.uk> <1300001@hplvli.HP.COM>
Sender: nobody@prles2.UUCP
Reply-To: meulenbr@cstw01.prl.philips.nl (Frans Meulenbroeks)
Organization: Centre for Software Technology, Philips Eindhoven
Lines: 17

In article <1300001@hplvli.HP.COM> boyne@hplvli.HP.COM (Art Boyne) writes:
>BTW, what is the "perfect" score for wanderer (as posted).  I
>got a final score of 39,688 - has anyone done any better?
Hah. I got:
 1 40576  51      meulenbr                 killed by a non-existant screen
You'll have to try harder :-) Anyone a better score on 1-50?
I had to leave some turf, but don't know any more how much and where.

Art, your turf list never reached us. Could you mail me a copy?

By the way: I have to point out one thing. I had a screen.4 with lines
which were too short. I replaced screen.4 with the one from the very
first distribution. This is exactly the same screen, but with the proper
line length.
Frans Meulenbroeks        (meulenbr@cst.prl.philips.nl)
	Centre for Software Technology
	( or try: ...!mcvax!phigate!prle!cst!meulenbr)