Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!boulder!sunybcs!ugkamins From: ugkamins@sunybcs.uucp (John Kaminski) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: ARexx script postings. Message-ID: <6038@cs.Buffalo.EDU> Date: 22 May 89 21:14:10 GMT References: <2420@van-bc.UUCP> <2101@blake.acs.washington.edu> Sender: nobody@cs.Buffalo.EDU Reply-To: ugkamins@sunybcs.UUCP (John Kaminski) Organization: SUNY/Buffalo Computer Science Lines: 30 In article <2101@blake.acs.washington.edu> dlarson@blake.acs.washington.edu (Dale Larson) writes: =>In article lynn@rave.phx.mcd.mot.com (Lynn D. Newton) writes: =>> =>>Larry Phillips writes that he would like to post ARexx scripts. =>>If votes count, I'd like to cast one. I just bought ARexx a =>>couple of weeks ago and love it. If you thumb through Amiga =>>magazines you notice more and more products advertising ARexx =>>ports. => =>>If there are some who feel that comp.sys.amiga is not the proper =>>location for such traffic, what does anyone think about forming =>>another news group for it? => =>I am not at all interested in ARexx scripts. It is clear, however, that =>a lot of people are. From the number of postings I see here and elsewhere =>about ARexx, I think it's time for comp.sys.amiga.arexx. There are already =>to many topics flying around in comp.sys.amiga! => => => =>-- => dTb dTb => I know enough about epistemology to know that I don't know anything => about programming OR epistemology! => Digital Teddy Bear dlarson@blake.acs.washington.edu ARexx looks like it might be a good language. So is C. So is Pascal. So are a whole host of other languages. Why not use comp.sources.amiga, or comp.lang.rexx?