Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!ncar!noao!asuvax!rave!lynn From: lynn@rave.phx.mcd.mot.com (Lynn D. Newton) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: ARexx script postings. Message-ID: Date: 22 May 89 19:55:25 GMT References: <2420@van-bc.UUCP> <2101@blake.acs.washington.edu> Sender: lynn@rave.phx.mcd.mot.com Organization: Motorola MCD Lines: 27 In-reply-to: dlarson@blake.acs.washington.edu's message of 20 May 89 15:45:40 GMT One reader replies, concerning my previous advocacy for the posting of ARexx scripts: > I am not at all interested in ARexx scripts. It is clear, however, that > a lot of people are. From the number of postings I see here and elsewhere > about ARexx, I think it's time for comp.sys.amiga.arexx. There are already > to many topics flying around in comp.sys.amiga! No problem; personally I read all the groups. Is there anything wrong with posting them to comp.source.amiga? Or is there a rule that such postings all have to be C or assembler listings? Seems to me this is a good spot for _any_ kind of program listing, including Forth, Modula-2, and even AmigaBASIC and CLI batch scripts. One problem I see with this, though, is that this group has a moderator who fields postings and picks and chooses them. Right? I'm relatively new to the net so haven't really figured out how some of this works. Anyhow, there probably wouldn't be enough traffic for a comp.sys.amiga.arexx group. Anyone else have any opinions? -- ================================================================= Lynn D. Newton | System Test Motorola MCD, Tempe, AZ | (Department of Heuristic Methodology) (602) 437-3739 | "The bug stops here!" lynn@rave.phx.mcd.mot.com |