Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:34375 comp.os.vms:14746 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!iuvax!bsu-cs!cfchiesa From: cfchiesa@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Christopher Chiesa) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.os.vms Subject: Re: VT100 2.9 (was Re: something else) Summary: Sorry about that. Message-ID: <7427@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> Date: 25 May 89 13:54:47 GMT References: <7362@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> <792@pccuts.pcc.amdahl.com> Organization: CS Dept, Ball St U, Muncie, IN, USA Lines: 20 In article <792@pccuts.pcc.amdahl.com>, acs@pccuts.pcc.amdahl.com (Tony Sumrall) writes: . In article <7362@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> cfchiesa@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Christopher Chiesa) . writes: . >I've noticed some variations in this area myself, but found that on my Amiga . >the program "VT100" (I currently use v2.8, although v2.9 is out) works perfectly . >with VMS, EDT, et al. In fact, it works BETTER with EDT than some actual . >VT300's etc. that I've used! . . Let me correct one of your statements: VT100 R2.9 is NOT out -- I should . know because I'm the guy working on it! Good heavens, I'm mortified...! I could have sworn the people on (unnamed system)'s Amiga user group were all a-babble over v2.9 AGES ago... And I know I'm running 2.8 and DON'T have Tek terminal emulation, whereas a friend of mine is running (now I don't know WHAT version) and DOES have Tek emulation... Now I'm CONFUSED as well as IGNORANT... -- UUCP: !{iuvax,pur-ee,uunet}!bsu-cs!cfchiesa cfchiesa@bsu-cs.UUCP