Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!ames!amdahl!pccuts!acs From: acs@pccuts.pcc.amdahl.com (Tony Sumrall) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: VT100 2.9 (was Re: something else) Message-ID: <799@pccuts.pcc.amdahl.com> Date: 26 May 89 00:08:37 GMT References: <7362@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> <792@pccuts.pcc.amdahl.com> <7427@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> Reply-To: acs@pccuts.pcc.amdahl.com (Tony Sumrall) Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA Lines: 31 In article <7427@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> cfchiesa@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Christopher Chiesa) writes: ->In article <792@pccuts.pcc.amdahl.com>, acs@pccuts.pcc.amdahl.com (Tony Sumrall) writes: ->. Let me correct one of your statements: VT100 R2.9 is NOT out -- I should ->. know because I'm the guy working on it! -> ->Good heavens, I'm mortified...! I could have sworn the people on (unnamed ->system)'s Amiga user group were all a-babble over v2.9 AGES ago... Don't be mortified; a LOT of people think that 2.9 is out. It's mostly my fault since I have been talking about 2.9 for about a year but still haven't been able to get all of the changes in. Sorry about that. -> ... And I ->know I'm running 2.8 and DON'T have Tek terminal emulation, whereas a ->friend of mine is running (now I don't know WHAT version) and DOES have Tek ->emulation... Now I'm CONFUSED as well as IGNORANT... I'm glad to see other people modifying VT100 to do what they want it to do. I just wish that they wouldn't post their modified version under the name of VT100. VT100 is, however, PD so there's nothing to be done. I'm sorry for the confusion that this has caused you. THE VT100 doesn't do Tek emulation. ->UUCP: !{iuvax,pur-ee,uunet}!bsu-cs!cfchiesa ->cfchiesa@bsu-cs.UUCP -- Tony Sumrall acs@pccuts.pcc.amdahl.com <=> amdahl!pccuts!acs [ Opinions expressed herein are the author's and should not be construed to reflect the views of Amdahl Corp. ]