Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!bloom-beacon!usc!pollux.usc.edu!papa
From: papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Will Commodore Amiga PLEEZE answer this question...
Message-ID: <17532@usc.edu>
Date: 31 May 89 16:50:52 GMT
References: <16305@gryphon.COM>
Sender: news@usc.edu
Reply-To: papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa)
Organization: Felsina Software, Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 20

In article <16305@gryphon.COM| rickf@pnet02.cts.com (Rick Flower) writes:
|I posted a message earlier in the week asking about Mutual Exclusion of
|Boolean Gadgets, and I have received several letters from other users out
|there (thank guys, for the input!!).  Most of those people didn't or couldn't
|make this "mutual exclusion of gadgets" work.. I know that the old RKM's say
|that this field in the Gadget structure is ignored, but according to the
|Workbench 1.3 Assembly Include headers, it makes it sound as if this feature
|is now working in 1.3!  I'm basically asking if this is the case, and if so,
|how the heck can I get it to work??

The reason you got no answer is because this has ben rehashed at least 20 
times one this forum.  I believe that the "intro" message that is posted 
everyonce in a while tells you how to do it.  The answer is documented in
the 1.2 WB Enhancer manual.  Time for posting an "intro" again?

-- Marco Papa 'Doc'
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
uucp:...!pollux!papa       BIX:papa       ARPAnet:pollux!papa@oberon.usc.edu
 "There's Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Diga!" -- Leo Schwab [quoting Rick Unland]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=