Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!pro-nucleus.UUCP!hzink From: hzink@pro-nucleus.UUCP (Harry Zink) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: Piracy...$2/shaft Message-ID: <8905240736.AA18683@crash.cts.com> Date: 23 May 89 20:32:24 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: pnet01!pro-sol!pro-nucleus!hzink@nosc.mil Organization: The Internet Lines: 33 Network Comment: to #948 by pnet01!crash!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!obsolete!nazgul I think that a clarification is in order. When the infamous $2.00 product was mentioned, I am pretty sure that the author did not simply refer to the production costs, but to the overall value of the program itself. Let's face it, there are programs out there where the publisher charges $45 and more, but it is hardly worth the materials it is reproduced on. That, I believe, is the shaft spoken of, and in this kind of situation I can sympathize with piracy for the sole point of EVALUATING the package. Once you have decided it is trash you can either delete it, or store it in a dark place to show to others if they harbor any desire to buy the same package (Precisely waht I used to do with 'Gauntlet GS' and 'Paperboy GS'). I would like to ask the fervent defenders of law and order (said with a smile), what do they propose for the various situations outlined by various international and domestic members of this newsgroup. Specifically, please address the issue of scarce to non-existing software availability in foreign countries (France, Germany, Sweden); the issue of software previews through piracy; the matter of 'trash' software (remember, most software CAN NOT be returned once purchased - only returned for exchange or credit. So, if you purchase a piece of software and it turns out to be trash, you are still out of the money in most cases - and demo disks always only show the best of the programs...) I mean, we all know that you consider piracy (or whatever you want to call it) to be the 'most heinous' (to quote Bill & Ted) activity under the sky - but I fail to see any constructive remarks towards alleviating the problems outlined above. + UUCP: ...!crash!pnet01!pro-sol!pro-nucleus!hzink Proline: hzink@pro-nucleus +