Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!pasteur!ames!elroy!usc!polyslo!csun!csuna!abcscnge
From: abcscnge@csuna.csun.edu (Scott "The Pseudo-Hacker" Neugroschl)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: TC/QC,Windows (was MicroSoft vs Borland Again ...)
Message-ID: <2002@csuna.csun.edu>
Date: 24 May 89 02:13:47 GMT
References: <235@imspw6.UUCP>
Reply-To: abcscnge@csuna.csun.edu (Scott Neugroschl)
Organization: CSU Northridge
Lines: 16

In article <235@imspw6.UUCP> bob@imspw6.UUCP (Bob Burch) writes:
>Religious-war fans will get a kick out of Garry Ray's article on page
>49 of the May 22 issue of PC-WEEK.  The latest polls seem to show customers
>significantly more satisfied with Borlands programming products, INCLUDING
>the Turbo-C 2.0 package vs MS-C 5 comparison.  Interesting stuff.

Now if they only could get a Windows SDK for TC 2.0 -- sigh :-)

Anyone out there know if QC 2.0 will compile for windows (given the SDK)?


-- 
Scott "The Pseudo-Hacker" Neugroschl
UUCP:  ...!sm.unisys.com!csun!csuna.csun.edu!abcscnge
-- Beat me, Whip me, make me code in Ada
-- Disclaimers?  We don't need no stinking disclaimers!!!