Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:29307 comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d:3179
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mit-eddie!ll-xn!vlsi!malpass
From: malpass@vlsi.ll.mit.edu (Don Malpass)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: vi editor
Message-ID: <327@vlsi.ll.mit.edu>
Date: 25 May 89 15:24:20 GMT
References: <24788@beta.lanl.gov> <554@megatek.UUCP>
Reply-To: malpass@ll-vlsi.arpa.UUCP (Don Malpass)
Distribution: usa
Organization: MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington MA
Lines: 12

In article <554@megatek.UUCP> hollen@eta.megatek.uucp (Dion Hollenbeck) writes:
>Good editor and VI in the same breath are oxymoronic.....  

Whereas YOUR statement is simply moronic.
Why can't religious issues like PERSONAL PREFERENCES about editors
be eliminated from this forum.  It's all been said before - too often.
Flame all you want - all msgs will have expired before I return
from vacation.
-- 
Don Malpass   [malpass@LL-vlsi.arpa],  [gandalf mailbox dead for now]
  You know you're making progress when you get back to
    where you were three weeks ago.          5/89 & 6/89