Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!haven!adm!husc6!endor!siegel From: siegel@endor.harvard.edu (Rich Siegel) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: LSP 2.0 Upgrade: Is it worth it? Keywords: LSP2.0 Pascal Programming Message-ID: <1931@husc6.harvard.edu> Date: 25 May 89 12:12:33 GMT References: <1989May24.123418.5967@mntgfx.mentor.com> Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu Reply-To: siegel@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel) Organization: Symantec/THINK Technologies, Bedford, MA Lines: 44 In article <1989May24.123418.5967@mntgfx.mentor.com> bruceh@mntgfx.mentor.com (Bruce Holm) writes: >----- > >I still have LSP v1.11. I am aware that the current version is 2.01. >I am trying to decide if the upgrade is worth it (~$49 + s/h). > In addition to that which I've mentioned, I might add that Lightspeed Pascal 2.0 also works correctly on newer machines and under MultiFinder; the code generator is more reliable, and the runtime libraries are much improved in performance and reliability. The Toolbox interfaces are up to date with respect to MPW Pascal 2.02, which means they include the routines up to and including Inside Mac volume 5. The Pascal extensions aren't for "use" with MPW Pascal, they're for compatibility. The extensions include such features as LHS typecasting, function result qualification, EXIT, CYCLE, LEAVE, constant expressions, and short-circuit Boolean operators. These features are useful even if you don't use MPW Pascal. The new source debugger adds the ability (in LightsBug) to display variables symbolically, rather than in hex, and to explode structured and pointer-based types to view their contents symbolically. The manual's also been rewritten, and includes more information and demo programs. IMHO, $49 isn't a whole lot to ask, considering what you get. --Rich ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Rich Siegel Staff Software Developer Symantec Corporation, Language Products Group Internet: siegel@endor.harvard.edu UUCP: ..harvard!endor!siegel "She told me to make myself comfortable, so I pulled down my pants and sat in the pudding." -Emo Phillips ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~