Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!intercon!amanda@intercon.UUCP From: amanda@intercon.UUCP (Amanda Walker) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer Subject: Re: Re: System 7.0 Q & A -- memory protection (none) Message-ID: <20-May-89.034454@192.41.214.2> Date: 20 May 89 07:35:16 GMT References: <365@taniwha.UUCP> Sender: news@intercon.UUCP Reply-To: amanda@intercon.UUCP (Amanda Walker) Organization: InterCon Systems Corporation, Sterling, VA Lines: 23 In article <365@taniwha.UUCP>, paul@taniwha.UUCP (Paul Campbell) writes: > - I realise that the developer's conference was fairly public > but was the information given out there (and in these documents) > public .... ie am I allowed to talk about it here ... Well, some of the notes are marked "Apple Confifential," and some aren't. I made sure the VM section wasn't marked "Confidential" before I mentioned it... > - Apple went to great trouble to point out that ALL of this information > is preliminary and that any or all of it may change before release Indeed. My main point was that reasoning from preconceptions about "how Apple would do it" (as Tim was evidently doing :-)) doesn't jive with what Apple has actually said. While all of the information is preliminary, it does lay out a pretty clear description of the territory, anyway... -- Amanda Walker InterCon Systems Corporation -- This posting is my opinion, not my employer's, even if the two do happen to coincide.