Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!mtxinu!taniwha!paul
From: paul@taniwha.UUCP (Paul Campbell)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: System 7.0 Q & A -- memory protection (none)
Message-ID: <366@taniwha.UUCP>
Date: 21 May 89 18:46:22 GMT
References: <1838@internal.Apple.COM> <7320@hoptoad.uucp> <1906@internal.Apple.COM> <7350@hoptoad.uucp> <364@taniwha.UUCP> <7357@hoptoad.uucp> <31132@apple.Apple.COM> <7383@hoptoad.uucp>
Reply-To: paul@taniwha.UUCP (Paul Campbell)
Organization: Taniwha Systems Design, Oakland
Lines: 15

In article <7383@hoptoad.uucp> tim@hoptoad.UUCP (Tim Maroney) writes:
>Then why does the seventh question and answer under "32-Bit Addressing"
>in the "Developer Conference Q&A" in the current developer mailing say
>that a ROM upgrade will likely be required to run in 32-bit mode?  Also,

The only mention I remember of a ROM upgrade was for those people still running
on the 64k ROMs .... (oops that includes me :-(

	Paul

-- 
Paul Campbell
Taniwha Systems Design			UUCP:		..!mtxinu!taniwha!paul 
Oakland CA				AppleLink:	D3213
Achtung! Ve are from ze Interface Police! Ve vant to look und feel!