Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wasatch!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!att!mtuxo!mtfmi!mec
From: mec@mtfmi.att.com (M.CONNICK)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: OOP & LSP (oops, Think Pascal)
Message-ID: <1091@mtfmi.att.com>
Date: 22 May 89 14:57:15 GMT
References: <1384@ndmath.UUCP> <1927@internal.Apple.COM> <18612@cup.portal.com> <1887@husc6.harvard.edu> <1079@mailrus.cc.umich.edu>
Reply-To: mec@mtfmi.UUCP (79153-M.CONNICK)
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Middletown NJ
Lines: 18

In article <1079@mailrus.cc.umich.edu> cash@csmil.umich.edu (Howard Cash) writes:

> I am writing a fairly large program using LSC and this kind of posting 
> gives me pause.  Apple Computer tells us we shoutld all concentrate on
> object oriented languages.  A respected engineer at the company that 
> MAKES my favorite C compiler says that Object Pascal improves the 
> maintainability of his software.
> 
> Question:  Am I making a mistake by doing my development in LSC?

If you'll get ahold of the shareware OIC (Objects in C) package,
you'll be able to do object-oriented programming in Lightspeed C. OIC
is very slick, I even prefer it to the C++ I use here at Bell Labs
under UNIX.

-----------------------------------------------------
Michael Connick    att!mtfmi!mec        201-957-3057
AT&T Bell Labs     MT 3F-113	        (Dept. 79153)