Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!mjohnson
From: mjohnson@Apple.COM (Mark B. Johnson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: System 7.0 Q & A -- memory protection (none)
Message-ID: <31425@apple.Apple.COM>
Date: 23 May 89 17:23:01 GMT
References: <1838@internal.Apple.COM> <7320@hoptoad.uucp> <1906@internal.Apple.COM> <7350@hoptoad.uucp> <364@taniwha.UUCP> <7357@hoptoad.uucp> <31132@apple.Apple.COM> <7383@hoptoad.uucp> <366@taniwha.UUCP> <7392@hoptoad.uucp> <367@taniwha.UUCP> <7396@hoptoad.uucp> <2
Organization: Apple Computer Inc, Cupertino, CA
Lines: 22

In article <22437@srcsip.UUCP> mnkonar@src.honeywell.com (Murat N. Konar) writes:
>With all the postings about whether the ROMs are 32 bit clean, I'd like to
>point out that in Tech Note 212 (I think) "The Joy of Being 32 Bit Clean" it
>is stated that there is currently no way to write a 32-bit clean CDEF, since
>the Control Manager passes the CDEF a handle with the high bit set to indicate
>that the CDEF is to return the rgn of its indicator instead of the whole 
>control.  They recommend bypassing the Control Manager entirely if you need
>to be absolutely 32-bit clean.  That is until they revise the interface.
>

Look for a revision of this Note which delves into more detail on this topic
in the June release of Mac Notes...



Mark B. Johnson                                            AppleLink: mjohnson
Developer Technical Support                         domain: mjohnson@Apple.com
Apple Computer, Inc.         UUCP:  {amdahl,decwrl,sun,unisoft}!apple!mjohnson

"You gave your life to become the person you are right now.  Was it worth it?"
                                                         - Richard Bach, _One_